Abstract
One of the diseases that many people suffered as a result
of gingival inflammation is gingivitis. Gingivitis can be cured
with intensive treatment, namely by way of a toothbrush is
good and true, tartar cleaning and the use of mouthwash.
According to the American Dental Association ( ADA ) mouthwash
should be able to kill organisms that can cause
disease or that are anti- bacterial and helps clean up the
leftovers . Antiseptic mouthwash to kill germs that can
cause plaque , gingivitis and bad breath. Khlorheksidine
mouthwash containing 0.2 % or povidone iodine antiseptic.
The research purpose to determine differences in the
effective use of khlorheksidine 0.2 % and povidone iodine
against the gingival status of patients at the health center
Tegalrejo gingivitis.The kind of research in this thesis is a
quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest research
design. The study population was patients at the health
center Tegalrejo gingivitis . Sampling Method by Simple
Random Sampling by 30 respondents. Variable influence
khlorheksidine 0.2 % and povidone iodine, variables affected
gingival status. Techniques of data collection by the
respondents were divided into 2 groups, each group consisting
of 15 respondents , the respondent group I was fed
irrigation and mouthwash khlorheksidine 0.2 % . Group II
was fed irrigation respondents and povidone iodine mouthwash.
Statistical test using a different test Paired t-test.
The examination results obtained significantly by 0.000 <
p value of 0.05, meaning that Ho is rejected and Ha accepted
so there is a difference between the effective use of
khlorheksidine 0.2 % and povidone iodine against gingivitis
patients gingival status.There is a difference between
the effective use of khlorheksidine 0.2 % and povidone
iodine against gingivitis patients gingival status.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References NOT AVAILABLE
How to Cite This
Article Metrics
Download Statistics
Downloads
Other Statistics
